The U pre-eminent Court's decision in Carbone v Clarkstown left many municipalities wondering in what way they would pay for their waste facilities.

The U pre-eminent Court's decision in Carbone v Clarkstown left many municipalities wondering in what way they would pay for their waste facilities. yet the reality is, most will be all right with or without arise control.

Last year's U paramount Court decision regarding legislative melt control of municipal solid waste did what anyone observing the solid waste industry has known and calculate uponed for a long time - it officially recognized garbage as a valuable commodity, or, to be more precise, an anti-commodity.

In the May 1994 decision C&A Carbone v Town of Clarkstown, NY the court rul that legislation mandating the emanate of waste to or between the walls of a particular facility - follow control - inhibits interstate communion and, therefore, is unconstitutional. The decision placed in jeopardy many solid waste facilities that previously had relied onward local flow control agreements for steady receipts streams from tipping fees.

Flow